view counter
Understanding our Exams

How CXC Assesses Students

Criterion-Referenced Approach

CXC examinations are criterion-referenced. When setting standards or cut-off scores for each grade for Criterion Reference Tests, examiners are primarily concerned with whether or not candidates have reached established levels of mastery. They are interested in comparing examinees' performance, not with other examinees in the group, but with the preset standard judged to be adequate for the award of particular grades.

Examiners therefore determine the competencies, abilities and skills that candidates must demonstrate in order to qualify for particular grades. They look for certain qualities in the examinees' performance and use their judgment in so doing. This is not to say that the examiners completely ignore the general performance of the candidate population.

The examiners study the mark distributions and statistics on the examination; as a result, they sometimes decide to modify their original judgments, but they do not make grade decisions based firstly, or primarily, or solely, on specific percentages of candidates attaining at each grade or on the number of standard deviations candidates' scores lie above or below the mean.

The critical question is - Has a candidate demonstrated a given level of competence allowing the examiner to state with some degree of certainty that the candidate has attained the minimum standard required for a particular grade?

Standard Setting

Preliminary grade cut-off scores are specified at paper development. Subsequently, in a validation process, which takes place at the end of the marking exercise and during the grading exercise, the quality of candidates’ performance and scores are compared across adjacent years and sittings, and the preliminary cut-off scores may be adjusted. This is done in order to ensure that the objectively defined standard (that is, level of competence) connoted by each grade is maintained across time.

GRADE DEFINITIONS

CSEC

The Six-Point Grading Scheme

The Caribbean Examinations Council (CXC) introduced a six-point grading scheme for the Caribbean Secondary Education Certificate (CSEC), in the May/June 1998 examinations.

The six-point grading scheme reports on the performance of the candidate under six overall and profile grades as follows:

Overall grades - I, II, III, IV, V, VI

Profile grades - A, B, C, D, E, F

Grade and Profile Descriptions

The overall grade and profile descriptions are:

Overall Grades

GRADE I - Candidate shows a comprehensive grasp of the key concepts, knowledge, skills and competencies required by the syllabus.
GRADE II - Candidate shows a good grasp of the key concepts, knowledge, skills and competencies required by the syllabus.
GRADE III - Candidate shows a fairly good grasp of the key concepts, knowledge, skills and abilities required by the syllabus.
GRADE IV - Candidate shows a moderate grasp of the key concepts, knowledge, skills and competencies required by the syllabus.
GRADE V - Candidate shows a very limited grasp of the key concepts, knowledge, skills and competencies required by the syllabus.
GRADE VI - Candidate shows a very limited grasp of the key concepts, knowledge, skills and competencies required by the syllabus.

 

Profile Grades

A - Outstanding
B - Good
C - Fairly Good
D - Moderate
E - Weak
F - Poor

CAPE

Candidates receive a report for performance on each Unit. For each Unit, candidates receive:

(a) an overall grade (Grades I to VII) to indicate the quality of performance on the Unit as a whole;

(b) a module grade (Grades A to G) to reflect performance on each module of the Unit.

OVERALL GRADES

GRADE DEFINITION
I

Shows an excellent grasp of the principles, concepts and skills contained in the syllabus.

Applies principles, concepts and skills to problem situations and analyses, synthesizes and evaluates issues in a competent manner.

Organizes information meaningfully and communicates ideas in an effective manner.

II

Shows a very good grasp of the principles, concepts and skills contained in the syllabus.

Applies principles, concepts and skills to problem situations and analyses, synthesizes and evaluates issues in a competent manner.

Organizes information meaningfully and communicates ideas in an effective manner.

III Shows a good grasp of the principles, concepts and skills contained in the syllabus.Applies principles, concepts and skills to problem situations and analyses, synthesizes and evaluates issues in a competent manner.Organizes information meaningfully and communicates ideas in an effective manner.
IV

Shows a satisfactory grasp of the principles, concepts and skills contained in the syllabus.

Applies principles, concepts and skills to problem situations and analyses, synthesizes and evaluates issues in a competent manner.

Organizes information meaningfully and communicates ideas in an effective manner.

V Shows an acceptable grasp of the principles, concepts and skills contained in the syllabus.Applies principles, concepts and skills to problem situations and analyses, synthesizes and evaluates issues in a competent manner.Organizes information meaningfully and communicates ideas in an effective manner.
VI

Shows a limited grasp of the principles, concepts and skills contained in the syllabus.

Shows basic weaknesses in the application of principles, concepts and skills and in analyzing or evaluating issues.

Shows basic weaknesses in the organizing and communicating of information.;

VII

Shows a very limited grasp of the principles, concepts and skills contained in the syllabus.

Shows little or no skills in the application of principles, concepts and skills in analyzing or evaluating issues.

Shows poor skills in organizing and communicating of information.

 

MODULE GRADE   DEFINITION

 A

B

C

D

E

F

G

 

Excellent

Very Good

Good

Satisfactory

Acceptable

Limited

Very Limited

CCSLC

Composite Score Grade
75 - 100 Master
50 - 74 Competent
0 - 49 Developing Competence